Freedom of Expression in Algeria and Algorithmic Content Moderation: Procedural Safeguards in Comparative Perspective

Abstract

Algorithmic moderation by cross-border digital platforms raises a specific question for Algerian law: whether restrictions on users’ expression are accompanied by adequate procedural safeguards. The analysis brings together the technical and legal architecture of platform decision-making, Algeria’s sector-specific framework, and comparative developments in Germany, France, the European Union, Africa and the United Nations system. The inquiry focuses on notice, reasons, transparency about automation, review and redress. Algerian law regulates distinct aspects of unlawful content, data processing and contractual relations, but doesn’t establish a general procedure through which an affected user can understand and challenge a platform decision and obtain correction of its effects. The article argues for graduated safeguards calibrated to the source and seriousness of the restriction, linguistic context, preservation of evidence and the cross-border character of the service.